Neuroethics emerges as an interdisciplinary field tasked with dissecting the ethical, legal, and societal repercussions of neuroscientific advancements. Rooted in the escalating strides of neurotechnology, such as brain imaging techniques and cognitive enhancement methodologies, neuroethics grapples with moral quandaries precipitated by our burgeoning understanding of the brain and its societal implications. A pivotal locus of neuroethical inquiry resides in the incorporation of neuroscientific revelations into legal and moral decision-making frameworks. As neuroscience elucidates the biological substrates of human behavior, ethical dilemmas emerge concerning the extent to which such knowledge should shape concepts like criminal culpability and moral responsibility. Questions surface regarding the accountability of individuals afflicted with certain neurological conditions vis-à-vis those devoid of such conditions. Negotiating these quandaries, neuroethicists strive to ensure equity and justice within legal systems in light of neuroscientific insights. Furthermore, neuroethics pivots on the judicious application of neurotechnology across medical and non-medical spheres. Consider the potential of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) in restoring mobility for individuals with paralysis, juxtaposed against concerns regarding privacy breaches and potential misuse. Ethical assessments are indispensable to weigh the merits of such technologies against their inherent risks and unintended ramifications. Additionally, neuroethics delves into the ethical contours of cognitive enhancement endeavors, whether through pharmaceutical interventions or brain stimulation techniques aimed at bolstering cognitive faculties. While these interventions offer promise for individuals grappling with cognitive impairments, ethical deliberations ensue regarding fairness, equality, and the authenticity of human experience. Ethicists endeavor to delineate guidelines steering the responsible development and utilization of cognitive enhancement technologies, ensuring equitable access and mitigating potential harms. In essence, neuroethics navigates the intricate intersection of neuroscience, ethics, and societal implications, charting a course toward responsible innovation and equitable outcomes in an increasingly neurotechnological landscape.
Title : Narrative medicine: A communication therapy for the communication disorder of Functional Seizures (FS) [also known as Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures (PNES)]
Robert B Slocum, University of Kentucky HealthCare, United States
Title : Atypical presentation of Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy in a 16-year-old female: A case report
George Diaz, Memorial Healthcare Systems, United States
Title : Triple-network dysfunction, ME/CFS, and the NeuroPhysics Treatment Process “A dynamical systems perspective on psychophysical organization and environmental interaction”
Ken Ware, NeuroPhysics Therapy Institute and Research Centre, Australia
Title : In silico in vitro and in vivo study of geraniol role in Alzheimer's disease
Bhuvanesh Baniya, Mohanlal Sukhadia University, India
Title : Prince transform: a wave-mechanical framework for real-time EEG analysis and early seizure prediction using chirp and drift detection
Mustafa A Khan, Sevaro Health Inc., United States
Title : Gut-brain axis in autism spectrum disorder: MicroRNAs as a critical mediator of pathogenesis
Rahem Rahmati, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Iran (Islamic Republic of)